Sasaki has a long history of working on significant civic places: from participation in multiple U.S. embassies around the world, to decades of work on the U.S. Capitol Campus, to planning and design of state capitol campuses across the country. These icons cross generations, outlive design trends and political movements, and stand as the most fundamental physical spaces of our democracy.
In recent years, Sasaki has worked on capitol campuses from Minnesota to Texas and Wyoming to Washington, D.C.. These design assignments are challenging because of the strong historic legacy that these places have, the demands on new security measures, and the explicit requirement for free speech assembly. However, they also present an opportunity to rethink how these landscapes and districts integrate into the surrounding city fabric and provide spaces for governments to function and for daily life.
Historical Context
In approaching capitol districts, we at Sasaki look back to understand what the land or communities looked like before the creation of the ceremonial capitol landscape. Frequently, these districts were carved out of existing neighborhoods and natural features were eliminated. History is often reduced to a too-narrow ‘period of significance’ which marks when original design intent was last intact. This designation restricts amendments to the existing design and limits how new interventions lay atop historic patterns.
At Sasaki, we respect history and legacy, however we are not historic preservationists. We see the landscape as an ever-evolving palimpsest of ideas influenced by society over time. We believe there is room for addition, or subtraction, in an effort to make places more relevant to current needs.
Many of America’s capitol campuses were created in and around the time of the City Beautiful movement when America was drawing inspiration from broad axial relationships and grand civic scales of European capitals. Though striking, that era of American capitol area planning was intertwined with a legacy of neighborhood displacement and, later, urban renewal. Well into the middle of the 20th century, urban renewal practices in many of these capital cities included massive expanses of surface parking and overlays of major highway systems that separated capitol campuses from their communities. Due to their isolation and single-use nature, many of these campuses suffer from a lack of vitality and community ownership. Lastly, since state-owned land doesn’t pay taxes, capitol districts can become economic stressors in their cities.
Given the importance of these places and the many opportunities for interventions that make them more livable, more vibrant, and more inclusive, we seek out partnerships with clients around the country in order to revitalize these landscapes as places of modern expression and community voice.